In addition, it has a WEB management system that allows it to be managed centrally, without cumbersome configuration files, as it happens with Nagios. It is a complete development, not a Nagios fork, and its main feature is that it has a more holistic monitoring overview that covers performance, not just states (one of Nagios’ great shortcomings). 17 years have gone by and technology has evolved, with it, Nagios has grown through an ecosystem of “add-ons” or third-party plugins that try to complement missing features. The first Nagios version is from the last century: 1999. Before Nagios there were some options, but they were unprofessional or excellent tools that only applied to a specific task. Mainly because they are the first ones who did it right. Nagios is considered by some people (mainly by those who have been in the IT world for some time) as the “ de facto standard” in open source monitoring. The 3 tools to compareīefore delving into how good each of the monitoring software is, let’s take a brief look at what they are and how they achieved their leading positions. Therefore, extending the information that we provide in the article about best network monitoring tools, we will face these three monitoring giants regarding all the important aspects that a software with these features must comply with. Nagios was for years a benchmark among network, system and application monitoring systems for many companies Zabbix has been taking away market share for some time and Pandora FMS, with its own open source software, has made a name for itself. When it comes to choosing the ideal monitoring tool for any installation, one may ponder upon many doubts.
0 kommentar(er)
